Skip to content

Objectivity lost and AVE won in USC debate

by on 28 Jun, 2013

We had two good debates this week between  my University of Southern California students on two key aspects of journalism and PR.   The journalism aspect was the importance of the content and practice of “objectivity”.  The PR issue was the importance of Advertising Value Equivalent (AVE).

AVE is where the PR company reports to its client and tries to put a money value on the editorial coverage it was secured for its client.  If the article was an advert, what would it be worth?

Relationships

Both are key to how these “professions” relate to their clients.  In PR, how can the client put a money value on their PR service?  And in journalism, what is the relationship with listeners, readers and viewers?

Kant and the clock

The journalists arguing for objectivity even used the German Enlightenment philosopher Kant in their support.  But there is a problem with Kant.  He used to take his walk through the town at exactly the same time each day.   He used the church clock to tell the time.  But the church warden used to set the time by his walk because he was so regular.  Work than one out.

What's the time, Mr Kant?  Pic from  Stifts- och landsbiblioteket i Skara

What’s the time, Mr Kant? Pic from Stifts- och landsbiblioteket i Skara

Objectivity lost; and AVE won.

Advertisements
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: